🔗 Share this article

Thhese times present a very unique situation: the inaugural US parade of the overseers. They vary in their expertise and traits, but they all have the identical goal – to avert an Israeli breach, or even devastation, of Gaza’s fragile ceasefire. After the conflict concluded, there have been few days without at least one of Donald Trump’s envoys on the ground. Only in the last few days featured the arrival of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all appearing to execute their assignments.

Israel engages them fully. In just a few short period it launched a series of operations in the region after the deaths of two Israeli military troops – leading, as reported, in dozens of local casualties. Multiple officials demanded a resumption of the fighting, and the Knesset enacted a early measure to take over the West Bank. The American response was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

But in various respects, the Trump administration appears more intent on upholding the current, uneasy period of the ceasefire than on progressing to the next: the reconstruction of Gaza. Regarding that, it seems the US may have goals but little specific strategies.

At present, it remains uncertain at what point the planned global administrative entity will truly begin operating, and the same applies to the appointed military contingent – or even the makeup of its members. On a recent day, Vance said the United States would not dictate the membership of the international force on Israel. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s government persists to refuse one alternative after another – as it did with the Turkish offer recently – what follows? There is also the reverse question: which party will decide whether the forces favoured by Israel are even interested in the task?

The matter of how long it will require to neutralize Hamas is equally unclear. “Our hope in the administration is that the international security force is will now take charge in neutralizing Hamas,” said the official lately. “It’s will require a while.” Trump only highlighted the uncertainty, saying in an interview on Sunday that there is no “hard” schedule for the group to demilitarize. So, in theory, the unknown members of this still unformed international contingent could arrive in the territory while the organization's militants continue to remain in control. Would they be dealing with a governing body or a insurgent group? Among the many of the issues emerging. Some might question what the result will be for ordinary civilians under current conditions, with Hamas continuing to focus on its own opponents and dissidents.

Recent developments have once again highlighted the omissions of Israeli media coverage on each side of the Gazan boundary. Every source seeks to examine all conceivable angle of the group's breaches of the peace. And, usually, the fact that Hamas has been delaying the return of the bodies of killed Israeli captives has taken over the coverage.

Conversely, coverage of civilian deaths in the region caused by Israeli attacks has received scant focus – if at all. Take the Israeli retaliatory attacks in the wake of Sunday’s southern Gaza event, in which two soldiers were lost. While Gaza’s authorities reported dozens of casualties, Israeli news analysts criticised the “moderate reaction,” which hit just installations.

This is typical. Over the past few days, the press agency accused Israel of violating the peace with the group 47 occasions after the truce came into effect, causing the death of 38 Palestinians and injuring an additional 143. The assertion was unimportant to the majority of Israeli news programmes – it was just ignored. Even reports that eleven individuals of a local household were killed by Israeli forces a few days ago.

Gaza’s civil defence agency said the family had been trying to go back to their home in the a Gaza City district of the city when the transport they were in was fired upon for reportedly passing the “boundary” that marks territories under Israeli military authority. That yellow line is unseen to the human eye and shows up just on plans and in authoritative records – not always obtainable to ordinary residents in the region.

Yet this incident scarcely received a mention in Israeli journalism. Channel 13 News referred to it in passing on its online platform, quoting an Israeli military official who explained that after a questionable car was detected, forces fired cautionary rounds towards it, “but the transport persisted to approach the soldiers in a fashion that created an immediate risk to them. The soldiers engaged to eliminate the danger, in line with the truce.” Zero injuries were stated.

With this perspective, it is no surprise numerous Israelis feel the group solely is to blame for infringing the peace. This belief risks prompting appeals for a tougher strategy in Gaza.

At some point – maybe sooner than expected – it will not be adequate for all the president’s men to play caretakers, advising Israel what to refrain from. They will {have to|need